Saturday, 24 April 2010
Sunday, 18 April 2010
Saturday, 17 April 2010
OUGD204: Self Evaluation
1. What skills have you developed through this module and how effectively do you think you have applied them?
This module for me was all about getting to grips with the technical aspects of type and grasping how to apply fundamental elements and rules in relation to point size, weight, case and leading etc. In making progress on this I believe that I have also developed a much stronger sense of hierarchy with some areas almost developing into intuition. In addition, the application of grid structures and understanding what you can explore in regards to margins and gutters has assisted me no end in producing more consistent layouts that suit the purpose of the document.
2. What approaches to/methods of research have you developed and how have they informed your design development process?
Primarily my research has been driven through collecting and sourcing relevant materials to be documented within the type journal. Furthermore, I have also requested numerous stock samples from suppliers such as Benwells which has been useful no end; especially as you can specify what you would like to receive in terms of letter heads, business cards and compliment slips etc. In direct relation to magazine layout, analysing publications such as Grafik and Creative Review was also useful.
3. What strengths can you identify in your work and how have/will you capitalise on these?
My strengths in this module have come through understanding the fundamental rules of typography taught to us within the timetabled sessions. In gaining this knowledge I have been able to rapidly advance in producing more consistent layouts that suit the purpose and temperament that they were designed for. In order to capitalise on this and make the most of what I have learnt, I would like to push the boundaries further and explore what is achieving whilst breaking rules through being informed of what they were in the first place.
4. What weaknesses can you identify in your work and how will you address these more fully?
As stated by a few of my peers, I also feel that my weakness within this module has been the type journal. Although I have engaged with it well at points, I largely felt I was compiling it as means of assessment; not because I actually enjoyed it and found the benefits of its existence helpful. Through collecting source materials for research I have been able to enhance my learning of typography, however I feel I may have over analysed what I was looking at – subsequently causing me to not enjoy the process. Next time I feel it would be beneficial treat the type journal in a more light hearted manner and enjoy researching in ‘little and often’ visits, as opposed to ‘intense but not so often’.
5. Identify five things that you will do differently next time and what do you expect to gain from doing these?
1. Dedicate time to engage with type journal and the benefits that it provides.
2. Spend those extras few minutes/hours to explore just a few more possible outcomes in terms of layout.
3. Make decisions faster, as although I improved on this I still idle about too much.
4. Try to focus more time on collecting useful materials for research. Research I have learnt; is vital.
5. Push boundaries in terms of hierarchy and try to make progress more quickly.
6. How would you grade yourself on the following areas:
Attendance 4
Punctuality 5
Motivation 4
Commitment 3
Quantity of work produced 4
Quality of work produced 4
Contribution to the group 3
This module for me was all about getting to grips with the technical aspects of type and grasping how to apply fundamental elements and rules in relation to point size, weight, case and leading etc. In making progress on this I believe that I have also developed a much stronger sense of hierarchy with some areas almost developing into intuition. In addition, the application of grid structures and understanding what you can explore in regards to margins and gutters has assisted me no end in producing more consistent layouts that suit the purpose of the document.
2. What approaches to/methods of research have you developed and how have they informed your design development process?
Primarily my research has been driven through collecting and sourcing relevant materials to be documented within the type journal. Furthermore, I have also requested numerous stock samples from suppliers such as Benwells which has been useful no end; especially as you can specify what you would like to receive in terms of letter heads, business cards and compliment slips etc. In direct relation to magazine layout, analysing publications such as Grafik and Creative Review was also useful.
3. What strengths can you identify in your work and how have/will you capitalise on these?
My strengths in this module have come through understanding the fundamental rules of typography taught to us within the timetabled sessions. In gaining this knowledge I have been able to rapidly advance in producing more consistent layouts that suit the purpose and temperament that they were designed for. In order to capitalise on this and make the most of what I have learnt, I would like to push the boundaries further and explore what is achieving whilst breaking rules through being informed of what they were in the first place.
4. What weaknesses can you identify in your work and how will you address these more fully?
As stated by a few of my peers, I also feel that my weakness within this module has been the type journal. Although I have engaged with it well at points, I largely felt I was compiling it as means of assessment; not because I actually enjoyed it and found the benefits of its existence helpful. Through collecting source materials for research I have been able to enhance my learning of typography, however I feel I may have over analysed what I was looking at – subsequently causing me to not enjoy the process. Next time I feel it would be beneficial treat the type journal in a more light hearted manner and enjoy researching in ‘little and often’ visits, as opposed to ‘intense but not so often’.
5. Identify five things that you will do differently next time and what do you expect to gain from doing these?
1. Dedicate time to engage with type journal and the benefits that it provides.
2. Spend those extras few minutes/hours to explore just a few more possible outcomes in terms of layout.
3. Make decisions faster, as although I improved on this I still idle about too much.
4. Try to focus more time on collecting useful materials for research. Research I have learnt; is vital.
5. Push boundaries in terms of hierarchy and try to make progress more quickly.
6. How would you grade yourself on the following areas:
Attendance 4
Punctuality 5
Motivation 4
Commitment 3
Quantity of work produced 4
Quality of work produced 4
Contribution to the group 3
Wednesday, 14 April 2010
Self Promotion 05
Haven't had time to re-visit my self promotion over Easter up until now as I was fortunate enough to visit Berlin last week. Wish I was back there already. Anyway...
Beginning to feel like I am getting close to a resolve with this idea, not that I am entirely sure that I am 100% happy but I believe this identity is a lot more successful than the previous. It would seem no matter how hard I try, the letters 'L' and 'H' will just not look good together. So square and dull, not much to work with really.
In editing the original Bodoni typeface, I have flattened out the serifs as they were driving me crazy and have most notably stuck to the straight stem on the lower case 'a'. Why it was rounded in the first place is slightly beyond me.
Other than that I have mainly attempted to kern the letters to absolute perfection and gain a sense of neutrality between them all; had to bring the 'e' in a little as it seemed lonely.
To move on from here I think it may be wise to approach a use of colour, not that this is essential in my opinion.
Beginning to feel like I am getting close to a resolve with this idea, not that I am entirely sure that I am 100% happy but I believe this identity is a lot more successful than the previous. It would seem no matter how hard I try, the letters 'L' and 'H' will just not look good together. So square and dull, not much to work with really.
In editing the original Bodoni typeface, I have flattened out the serifs as they were driving me crazy and have most notably stuck to the straight stem on the lower case 'a'. Why it was rounded in the first place is slightly beyond me.
Other than that I have mainly attempted to kern the letters to absolute perfection and gain a sense of neutrality between them all; had to bring the 'e' in a little as it seemed lonely.
To move on from here I think it may be wise to approach a use of colour, not that this is essential in my opinion.
Tuesday, 6 April 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
